The concept of boundary elasticity describes a state in between permeable and non-permeable boundary conditions of a system. Such elasticity is considered as the basic characteristics of system resilience when dealing with uncertainty and multifaceted disruptions. This panel will explore the enabling policies and mechanisms that different IOs deployed in order to maintain a balance between the two boundary conditions for instance during the implementation of the PRSPs.
It is argued that the intensity of globalisation spurred forth by ideology, necessity and technology has “washed away” in many instances the organisational boundaries that existed between IOs. For instance, voices of disenfranchised people or stakeholders are catered to when they are the loudest and receive high popular support, via social media or other crowd rousing tools even if it is not an IOs core mandate. Other voices, equally authentic, but not crowd pleasing are often drawn out and have little influence on the policy direction of the IOs.
It is the intent of this panel to use a few cases to illustrate the need to purposely ensure organisational boundary elasticity in order to maintain a constructive form of inter-agency coordination system. The panellist will aim to generate insights as to how to make the IOs become more cooperative thus more able to respond to the challenges and opportunities of the SDG agenda.
To be sustainable, an IO needs to manage this inherent system polarity of stability/predictability versus responsiveness/change of its organisational functioning. One of the modality is to create alternative policy spaces to allow for a multitude of voices to be presented in the debate so that the policy making process could be enriched, rather than hijacked by minority interests. Another modality could be to create formal policy coordination mechanisms with incentives and disincentives to guide the IOs towards more policy coherence and policy coordination.
One of the cases that will be presented will focus on the OECD Development Centre’s experience in creating inclusive networks around major themes of international development. These nonconventional networks bridged the donor countries and partner countries. By bringing together various think tanks from the Global North and Global South, perspectives were exchanged, needs aired and innovative ideas emerged.
Other examples of such boundary spanning initiatives will be presented by the participants who have many years of experience in the field relating to the workshop topic.
The relevance and importance of this topic lie in the ambitious 2030 Development Agenda, which require all actors to move out of their respective policy and operational silos in order to ensure successful implementation of the SDGs by 2030. Organisational boundary spanning and crossing will become the new norm for SDG implementation and will require new institutional learning and re-imagination of inter-agency coordination and consultation.
1. Prof Lichia Yiu, President, CSEND, Geneva
2. Prof Raymond Saner, Diplomacy Dialogue, CSEND, Geneva (Organiser)
3. Dr Taffere Tesfachew, former Director, Division on Africa, LDCs & Special Programmes, UNCTAD. (tbc)
4. Rashid Kaukak, Director, CUTS international, Geneva
5. Régis Avanthay, ret. OECD Development Center and SDC, Columbia
6. Dr Roland Bardy, University of Florida, ret. top manager of BASF, CSEND Vienna,(tbc)
7. Dr Christian Kingombe, consultant to African Dev. Bank & UNCTAD, prev. with ODI;
Saner, Raymond; Sapienza, Emanuele (2012); Development Diplomacy and Partnership for social Policy at the time of the PRSP: The case of Decent Work; 3(2) 145-180
Yiu, Lichia; Saner, Raymond (2011); Poverty Reduction Strategies Papers (PRSP) and the Health Sector; Journal of Poverty Alleviation and Development, Seoul, SK, 1(2) 135-180
Yiu, L. Saner, R., “Sustainable Development Goals and Millennium Development Goals: An analysis of the shaping and negotiation process”. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Routledge, June 2014, Vol. 36(2), p.89-107.